
Policy adviser, national ministry
The procedure briefings helped our team see where a amendment would stall in committee. We now read each issue before drafting.
Written reviews from officials, researchers and subscribers who use The Hague Governance Quarterly in their daily work.

Comments are shared with permission and edited only for length.

The procedure briefings helped our team see where a amendment would stall in committee. We now read each issue before drafting.

The budget reporting is careful about sources. Our seminar uses the audit explainers as course reading.
Clear, unhurried analysis of digital services gave our elected members the context they needed before the vote.
Signed commentary that disagrees with the official line is rare. We value that the journal publishes it.
Reviews are gathered from subscribers and partner offices after each quarterly issue, and we publish those that readers choose to share.
One regional team used our analysis of a procurement rule to prepare its own consultation response. The published case shows how their argument was built, step by step.

Want to share your own experience of the journal? Reach us through the contact page.